Dna diagnostics center full site8/13/2023 ![]() The order stated that it was a final and appealable order and that no just cause existed to delay its enforcement or appeal pursuant -2- No. On April 13, 2007, the trial court entered a final and appealable order that granted the Center summary judgment on the claim in plaintiffs' third amended complaint. The Center also moved for summary judgment on plaintiffs' complaint. The Center filed a third-party complaint against NICL and Gemma Ledesma, seeking contribution and indemnity. Plaintiffs sued the Center under various legal theories, including breach of agreement. Plaintiffs sued the Center based on the failure to properly label the sample purported to be Craig's. (NICL), drew blood from plaintiffs and Craig at different sites and mailed the samples to the Center in Ohio for testing. Third-party defendant, Northern Illinois Clinical Laboratory, Ltd. The present lawsuit arises out of the Center's agreement with Cheryl to perform the 2001 blood test. We also observed that the failure to label Craig's blood vial raised questions regarding the reliability of the chain of custody with respect to the 2001 blood test. 2-02-1331 (2003) (unpublished order under Supreme Court Rule 23)), finding, in part, that the 1987 blood test raised a material issue of fact regarding the reliability of the 2001 blood test. ![]() ![]() We reversed the order granting summary judgment to Craig and remanded the cause for further proceedings (Heiden v. The trial court granted Craig's motion for summary judgment, declaring that he was not the biological father of Amelia. However, blood tests taken in 1987 had revealed that there was a 99.93% chance that Craig was the father. In 2001, the Center tested an unlabeled vial of blood, which it presumed was Craig's, and the results excluded Craig as the father. On October 4, 2000, the trial court entered an agreed order for the parties to submit to blood tests to be conducted by the Center. 2-07-0620 the court to find that he was the natural father and to order him to pay a sum certain for Amelia's support. Cheryl claimed that Craig was the natural father of Amelia, and she asked No. Ottinger, who is not a party to this appeal, to determine the existence of a father-child relationship pursuant to the Illinois Parentage Act of 1984 (Act) (750 ILCS 45/1 et. FACTS On February 24, 1999, Cheryl, on her own behalf and on behalf of her then-minor daughter, Amelia, filed a petition against Craig H. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Heiden and Amelia Heiden, appeal the judgment of the circuit court of McHenry County, which granted summary judgment in favor of defendant, DNA Diagnostics Center, Inc. _ JUSTICE BURKE delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiffs, Cheryl A. McIntyre, Gemma Ledesma, Third-Party Defendants). 04-LA-266 ) Defendant and Third-Party ) Plaintiff-Appellee ) ) Honorable (Northern Illinois Clinical Laboratory, Ltd., and ) Maureen P. HEIDEN and AMELIA HEIDEN, ) Appeal from the Circuit ) Court of McHenry County. 2-07-0620 Filed: 11-9-09 _ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT _ CHERYL A.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |